Points about helping students to become effective critics of each other’s work
Most students do not naturally critique each other’s work effectively. This is something they have to be taught to do. There are several effective ways to do this.
? Model effective response by beginning with large group
response. Probe when students give each other vague or unhelpful
response and comment on why you are doing so. Model the skills you would
like them to practice in your own responses.
? Use a set procedure like the “Guidelines for Response Groups” which can be modified according to the needs of your
group. It may take them some time to get used to this, so be prepared to
have to point out when they have strayed and remind them to stick to the
guidelines. It is really useful to have
them complete the debriefing process in which they discuss how well they were
able to follow the protocol and how well it worked.
? In all cases, have the writer provide an introduction in which she tells
where she is with the piece and what specific help she needs. How can readers
help at this stage of the process? This gives students something concrete
to respond to.
? Go around the circle and get quick responses from every student, so that they
all realize they are responsible for listening. Sometimes it’s
helpful to direct these responses with a question like: What is the thing that
really stood out for you about this writing? What details do you most remember?
? Help students to shape their responses in effective ways by probing their
answers.
Ask them to tell the writer what they heard before allowing them to move to any kind of evaluation.
Vary the ways in which you have students respond to each other’s work. Here are some of the varieties I use:
? Large group sharing sessions
? Small group sharing sessions- you might want to assign these groups or
not. But you will want to help them to respond effectively.
Circulate and listen to how they are working. Appoint a timekeeper and
someone to facilitate. Be sure groups have a chance to evaluate their own
process.
? written response- students staple a paper with any
specific areas upon which they would appreciate feedback to the end of their
paper. Readers respond to the content of the paper, what they felt was
effective and respond to the writer’s need for help. Do this for a
specific length of time and then ask students to finish responding to the paper
they are working on.
? paired response
? written paired response- this can follow a form or
take the form of a written conversation.