Lecture—26 September 2003

 

Evidences of past life

Ediacara—soft-bodied forms, worms, jellyfish, anemones

Trace fossils—burrows, slime trails

Small shelly fauna—tiny pieces of calcareous material

Burgess Shale fauna—trilobites, cephalochordates, etc.

 

Are all related? There are some thoughts that the ediacara fossils represent one episode of experimentation, but that they left no descendents.  Perhaps their members were done in by the dramatic change in the Earth’s environment brought about by the “Snowball” Earth phenomenon. Others feel that the organisms that arose in the Cambrian arose from the ediacaran creatures.  At this point it is difficult to prove one idea or the other.

 

What is known is that all major bauplans are formed by the Cambrian (perhaps except for the bryozoa which are found from Ordovician age on).

 

Why no new bauplans?

Developmental  restrictions

May be conditions are not right

Limitation on available niches

 

 

New Topic--segmentation

 

Pseudosegmentation—tapeworm

 

Segmentation or metamerism—defined as a serial repetition of body parts

 

Theories

Budding but retention of bud with bud and source of bud having integrated life processes.

 

Advantages of segmentation

A segmental organism if injured can stand the loss of a body part (loss of back end of body by earthworms)

More efficient locomotion. Because of compartmentalized coelomic pouches, each segment can move independent of the other.

 

Looking ahead

 

Monday some more stuff on segmentation. Ecdysis